By Rynette R. Kjesbo, M.S., CCC-SLP
What is Cyberslang?
Cyberslang (also called textese, internet slang, internet
shorthand, or chatspeak) refers to words, abbreviations, and/or
acronyms frequently used in social media and text messaging.
Individuals often use cyberslang in an effort to save time,
reduce keystrokes, or limit characters in a message. Common
examples of cyberslang include using acronyms such as LOL
(meaning “laugh out loud”), replacing words like “you” and
“are” with the letters “u” and “r,” and using nonstandard
written words such as “4ever” instead of “forever” or “plz”
instead of “please.”
Is Cyberslang Helpful or Harmful?
In a rush to type out quick messages to friends, students often eliminate
grammatical elements such as capitalization, proper punctuation, or the
apostrophe in possessives and contractions (for example, “brads phone” instead
of “Brad’s phone”). In social media contexts and in text messaging, misspelled
words and abbreviated words are common. While this may lead to difficulty in
interpreting some messages (e.g., “ill c u l8r” really means “I’ll see you later.”)
most students know when these grammatical elements can be left out and when
more formal written language is required (such as when writing for educational/
academic reasons).
Some research even shows that cyberslang can actually teach positive language
skills. For example, many students who dislike writing willingly engage in
text messaging. This is because students view text messaging (unlike writing
“assignments”) as fun. Text messaging allows students to play with language
without having to worry about grammar and spelling rules. While the disregard
for grammar and spelling might sound like a harmful effect, frequent text
messaging exposes students to text which can lead to better phonological
awareness skills and improved reading skills.s
The ability to read and write competently is critical to success in school and
the “real world.” Cyberslang can have both positive and negative influences in
students’ reading and writing skills. As long as teachers, parents, and students
are aware of what these influences are, they can be on the lookout for the
harmful effects and can address them before they become problematic. For more
information about this topic, see Handy Handout #365, “Social and Academic
Vocabulary – What’s the Difference?”)
Resources
Chantal N. van Dijk, Merel van Witteloostuijn, Nada Vasic, Sergey Avrutin, and Elma Blom, “The Influence of Texting Language on Grammar and Executive Functions in Primary School Children,” accessed February 2, 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4816572/
|